I decided to have a short break from 'Monday's Word' and hope you'll join me in welcoming Fellow 'Brit Author' Paula Martin to my blog today. A bit later we'll hear about her new release 'His Leading Lady' but now relax, and let's hear from the lady herself.
Over to you Paula:
Writing Then and Now
Over to you Paula:
Writing Then and Now
My writing ‘career’ started in the mid-60’s when I submitted my first novel to Mills and Boon here in the UK. At the time they produced only hard-back ‘library’ romances, with the strap line ‘Pleasant Books.’ No sex before marriage – correction, no sex, not even the hint of it. They didn’t get near enough to the bedroom to close the door, let alone leave it open! A chaste kiss was all that was allowed. Divorce and illegitimacy were also completely taboo topics.
And what about the actual writing? I wrote everything in longhand. Masses of crossing out, insertions, extra paragraphs stapled to a page – however did we manage? Then came the laborious job of typing out the MS on an old upright Remington, with carbon paper to make a copy. One mistype and, if the correction paper wouldn’t hide it, the paper was ripped from the typewriter and you had to start the page all over again.
I was a complete innocent when it came to submitting. I didn’t know anything about agents or query letters or synopses. I had no critique partners, just a couple of friends who read my story and liked it. But I parcelled up the MS and put it in the post to M and B. I fully expected it to come winging back within a few days.
Six weeks later, I had a letter signed by Alan Boon himself. He (or the editor who wrote the letter – I’ll never know, since Alan signed everything) liked my story and my writing but there were a couple of chapters about which he had some reservations. He said that if I was prepared to revise, they would consider my story for publication. If I was prepared? Of course I was! I did the revision, typed the whole thing out again and sent it off. After two weeks, I had an acceptance letter, and a contract for two more novels.
First novel, first submission, and I was accepted. How lucky was that? And nothing at all about any promotion or marketing on my part. My first novel was published in May 1968, and my second and third novels were accepted immediately without any revision or editing. I had no input whatsoever into the covers of these, or the blurb on the back, or the longer summary on the inside cover. All I had to do was proof-read.
When Mills and Boon merged with Harlequin in the 70’s, everything changed. Sheiks, Greek millionaires and Latin Lotharios abounded. All arrogant, brooding, domineering males and wimpy females who finally (and happily! – what?) ‘submitted’ to them. Explicit sex became the order of the day too, almost rape in many cases.
Not my scene at all. I did submit another novel in the early 70’s which was rejected because it no longer fitted the new ‘formula’ – my hero was not dominant enough and there was no sex.
I abandoned fiction writing for many years and finally came back to it about 4 years ago when I re-discovered my muse by writing fan-fiction, and then started writing novels again.
And what a difference there is between writing in the 60’s and writing now.
First of all, computers! How much easier now to write, to change things as you go along, to cut and paste and to edit, to spell-check and to search for repeat words and phrases.
And the internet of course. In the 60’s, I was writing in isolation, I knew no other writers. Now I belong to several yahoo groups and have made many contacts with writers from all over the world. I’ve been lucky enough to find two critique partners who are honest, constructive and supportive.
How much easier, also, to do the research for a story. Back in the 60’s, I wanted to set one novel in an American college. This meant a visit to the library to find out the names and addresses of some colleges and then some letters to ask for their prospectus which, if I was lucky, arrived about two months later (airmail was FAR too expensive). I never completed that story. Now, of course, it would take only a few minutes to bring up hundreds of websites about American colleges and to download a full prospectus.
So what’s the downside? It seems that it’s now so much ‘easier’ to write a novel so the market is flooded with would-be writers. There’s a lot of advice out there about query letters, blurbs and synopses, all designed to grab an editor’s attention, and there must be thousands of ‘how to write a best-selling novel’ articles.
There also seem to be dozens of different genres, and I must admit I get a little confused at times about just what constitutes the different romance genres. Okay, I know the difference between sweet and erotic, but between sensual and sophisticated? It seems as of every publisher has its own interpretation.
Another change is that you are now expected to promote your own work, a task which can take a lot of time and energy, and which diverts you from actually writing stories.
It’s a different world but, on the whole, I DO prefer the present to the past! I realised that when I got an idea for a novel when I was in Egypt last October. I bought a notebook from the hotel’s bookshop, and scribbled furiously – and yes, there were all the crossings-out, insertions, extra paragraphs on separate pages with asterisks to denote where they belonged. I felt as if I had stepped back in time. When I got home, I couldn’t wait to transfer it all on to my computer, and to continue the story on the screen!
Thank you so much Paula. Yes, I agree with so much of what you say - and especially with how the internet has opened up the world for writers. Not just for research for for the wonderful comeraderie that seems to exist between writers the world over!
New Release: ‘His Leading Lady’ published by Whiskey Creek Press in June 2011 (www.whiskeycreekpress.com)
Jess Harper’s predictable life is turned upside down when she discovers that Lora, her twin sister, has disappeared. It’s just a week before rehearsals are due to start for a new West End musical in which Lora has the lead role. Jess decides to pose as her sister in order to save Lora's career. This brings her into close contact with arrogant theatre director Kyle Drummond. Attraction sparks between them but there’s also evidence that he had been dating Lora. So is Jess simply a substitute – in real life as well as in the show? And what will happen when Lora eventually returns?
BIO
Paula Martin had some early publishing success with short stories and four novels, but then had a break from writing while she brought up a young family and also pursued her career as a history teacher for twenty-five years. She has recently returned to writing fiction, after taking early retirement from teaching.
She lives near Manchester in North-West England, and has two daughters and two grandsons. Apart from writing, she enjoys travelling and has been to many places in Britain, mainland Europe, America, Canada and the Middle East. She loves visiting both familiar and new places, but Ireland is her very favourite place.
Contact Paula at:
Website: http://paulamartinromances.webs.com/
Personal Blog: http://paulamartinpotpourri.blogspot.com/
Writers Blog (with 4 other writers): http://heroineswithhearts.blogspot.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PaulaRomances



Good morning Paula,
ReplyDeleteWelcome to my blog. Congrtulations on the release of 'His Leading Lady'. It sounds like a scintillating read!
Wishing you many sales and much success.
It certainly does! Great interview, Lyn/Paula. Well done on persevering, Paula. It can be hard if your confidence gets knocked, wondering if you'll ever right write (as in what fits!). With four novels under your belt - and now this - you obviously can and do. Good luck! :)
ReplyDeleteHi Leanne - thank you so much for stopping by my blog and for your comment, Paula has certainly proved that perseverence pays hasn't she!
ReplyDeleteThanks for having me as your guest, Lyn.
ReplyDeleteLeanne, I was sure at one time that my fiction muse had deserted me. It came as quite a surprise that she returned!
Paula,
ReplyDeleteWhen writing is in your blood, you can take pauses to adjust to the demands of life, but you have to get back into it. You certainly inspire me.
Hi Lyn and Paula,
ReplyDeleteI agree that technology sure has changed the writing world. Not only in how we write and submit books, but in how we read them, too!
I so remember the days of the typewriter. In fact, my first (and extremely awful) attempt at writing a romance novel back in high school was done on my electric typewriter. I do believe I still have it lying around somewhere...hopefully in some dark and dusty corner where it will never see the light of day again.
Congrats, Paula on your latest release. I wish you many, many sales!
Hi Anna and Debra, thanks so much for visiting Paula at my blog today, and for your comments.
ReplyDeleteYes, as writers, you're right Anna, we do have to make changes in our lives to meet the demands of writing, but it's in one's blood, as you say!
LOl I too can relate to bashing out my first attempt at a novel on an old typewriter, Debra. Oh glory, Tippex and carbon paper. What fun!
Hi Paula, what a difference between then and now! You should be very proud that you've been able to roll with the different tides and find publishing success both times! I definitely prefer computers, though!
ReplyDeleteHi Jennifer, thanks so much for stopping by and commenting - yes I couldn't agree more (see my previous comment) despite 'freedzing' weird error messages and spellchecks that think they know better than you do, a computer on the whole makes writing an awful lot easier!
ReplyDeleteHi Ana, Debra, Jen - thanks so much for visiting and for your comments.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't want to go back to the world of longhand writing and typing (with Tippex and carbon paper). I'd much rather go cross-eyed staring at my computer screen!
Hi Paula ((((waves))) to Hywela Lyn,
ReplyDeleteLovely intro and interview!
Even if you've been there done it, doing it all over again is just as tough as first time around, as we're finding out! ;)
best
F
Seems that EVERY book is just as tough as the very first, Francine!
ReplyDeleteHi Paula - had to come and read your interesting post. What a change over the years - and I'm in awe of writers who managed without computers!
ReplyDeleteWe are so lucky with all the opportunities opening up to writers these days, yet perhaps it was much more meaningful to be published in those days?
However - I'd rather be doing it now!
Hi Lyn, sweet friend, and lovely to meet you, Paula. I love stories about twins and this one has winner written all over it. Best of luck.
ReplyDeleteHi I found you on Mary Bookhounds network your blog. I'm so glad I read your article on Paula Martin. It was very interesting and offered a lot of insight into why one doesn't or does get published.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciated what she said about all the would be writers. Yet at the same time I think writers have a little more autonomy now and aren't at the mercy of publishers who, as Paula said, will only publish certain forumilae.
If you'd like my blog is "Gently Mad" and you can come visit anytime. I mainly review books for different publishing companies.
http://sharonhenning.blogspot.com/
Hi Francine *waves back*. Thanks so much for stoppng by and leaving scommenting, so glad you enjoyed the post.
ReplyDeleteHi Rosemary
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting - and you're so right, in many ways things are a lot easier for writers today - now if only someone could invent a computer that would do all the promotion too!
Hi Sharon D, dear friend
ReplyDeleteThans so much for visiting, yes, Paula's book has 'winner' written all over it, as you say!.
Rosemary, thanks for visiting. Actually I think it's probably more meangingful being published today. Computers have made things easier in many ways, which means that many more writers are probably submitting their work than they did in the 60's. So it's probably harder now to be offered a contract than in the past.
ReplyDeleteSharon, thanks so much for your kind words. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that 'His Leading Lady' will attract a lot of readers.
ReplyDeleteHi Sharon - I agree that writers are less at the mercy of publishers - and I think the trend of self-publishing will increase enormously.
ReplyDeleteI am in awe of the very insightful reviews on your blog.
Lyn, I love the idea of a computer that will do all the promoting! I'm on a steep learning curve as far as promotion's concerned, as I didn't have to do this with my early books and am still trying to discover what works and what doesn't promotion-wise.
ReplyDeleteGlad to meet you on Book Blogs. Enjoyed the post about writing in the 60's v. now. It's hard to think how writers wrote and edited mss. with that old Remington and before that the quill.
ReplyDeleteHope to see you at my blog for a visit. I'm at http://writegame.blogspot.com.
See you again soon.
Great blog and post. I am a new follower GFC and I just liked your Face book page (My Life. One Story at a Time.) Would love a visit to my blog when you have moment. Hopefully you'll enjoy it enough to follow. Look forward to reading more of your posts. Donna
ReplyDeletehttp://mylife-in-stories.blogspot.com
Thanks for visiting, Lee and Donna.
ReplyDeleteI guess Shakespeare had it more difficult with his quill pen, Donna! Who knows how many more plays he might have written if he'd had a computer!
Donna, will visit your blog!
Hi Sharon H
ReplyDeleteThanks for finding me at Mary's Bookhounds and for taking the trouble to comment on Paula's post. (I checked out your blog too, very interesting. It wouldn't let me leave a comment but I will try again)
You're right, there are more options open to authors today than ever before, although that brings its own problems with so many authors vying for readers.
Hi Lee - thanks for the visit and the comment. Just returned the favour on your blog.
ReplyDeleteHey, Paula,
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Yup, still remember the old typewriter!!
Best of luck with His Leading Lady!!
Thanks so muuch for visiting, Toni. Using the old upright typewriters is one reason why i wear out keyboards so quickly now, I still thump the keys like a I did on the old Remington LOL
ReplyDeleteHi Toni
ReplyDeleteYup, those old upright typewriters were fun, weren't they. (I have to admit I did like the clack they made when you tapped the keys, the pc keyboard just doesn't sound the same.) I'd be lost without my pc or my laptop now!
Nostalgia about the old typewriters - remembering the 'ping' as you got to the end of a line and hitting the arm that took you to the next line (or not, if the roller bar was worn!)
ReplyDeletePutting in a new ribbon, too, was guaranteed to make your fingers black.
Oh, what fun we had! Thank heaven for computers (despite their frustrations at times).
Thanks for visiting and commenting on my blog! I just posted a new review and give away. I hope you'll pop over and enter! Donna
ReplyDeletehttp://mylife-in-stories.blogspot.com
Hi Paula and Lyn,
ReplyDeleteGreat blog. What a trip down memory lane. I can remember writing my novel in a note book, then typing it on my manual typewriter. (Actually I still write my first drafts in a notebook).Wasn't it a killer if you left out a word in the middle of the page, you had to type it all over again. I had a rather grand Olivetti in those days, but the computers have made a writers life so much easier. What would I do without cut and paste?
Cheers
Margaret
Hi Donna *waves*.
ReplyDeleteHi Margaret. Yes, cut and paste - I remember doing that with real paper and glue when I first started work in a Welsh University. How times have changed!